• WisPolitics

2013-14 Legislature: Printable directory | Leadership rosters | New faces


Wednesday, January 23, 2013

 2:09 PM 

Former DNR Sec. Meyer hits GOP bill for contested case hearing, mitigation

Former DNR Secretary George Meyer, who has opposed past versions of the mining bill, said to the committee that he takes significant issue with exemptions to the permit process and what he characterized as a weakened contested case hearing process.

Meyer, speaking as executive director of the Wisconsin Wildlife Federation, said that the contested case process has been switched to put the burden of proof on an objector and can't stop the company from mining once they have a permit in hand.

Meyer also said that the wetlands provision, aside from possibly running into issues with the feds, doesn't seem to address the problem of filling in or destroying wetlands because it doesn't focus on nearby impacted watersheds.

"There's going to be an impact to that [Bad River] waterway," Meyer said. "Not to mitigate in that watershed is hard to understand. Why would you want to mitigate in Spooner or Rhinelander when the damage is in Ashland County?"

Meyer also said that the timeline provided in the bill might be long enough to permit mines similar to the one in Jackson County, but that it would be problematic for a mine of the size GTAC is proposing.

Sen. Alberta Darling, R-River Falls, asked whether the DNR would knowingly approve a mining project that would pollute the environment. Meyer said the agency wouldn't willingly do it, but that the bill as written may force it into that position.

Meyer clarified after a question from Sen. Tom Tiffany, R-Hazelhurst, that the bill does not change air or water standards, but did weaken protections for navigable waters and wetlands.


Comments: 1

At January 24, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Blogger Nick Milroy said...

I wonder if Sen. Darling would knowingly approve mining legislation that explicitly allows for exemptions from environmental regulations and will without question pollute our environment?

Knowing the difference between the roles and responsibilities of lawmakers verses the DNR is an important part of the job of a legislator. Legislators create laws that allow for statutorily defined levels of pollution and the DNR enforces those standards no matter how lenient or stringent. The GOP mining bill allows for exemptions from pollution standards, essentially nullifying environmental regulations currently set in law.

 

Post a Comment

Back to Quorum Call main page

: See newer blog items : : See older blog items :

Quorum Call site feed
Advertisement
Advertisement

wispolitics.com Social News

Follow Us

ABOUT THE BLOG

WisPolitics coverage of news from the Wisconsin Legislature.

BLOG CONTRIBUTORS
Editor: JR Ross
Reporters: Andy Szal, Jason Smathers

LINKS
· Quorum Call site feed
· Quorum Call on Twitter

LEGISLATIVE LINKS

SESSION INFO
· InSession: Senate | Assembly
· Audio/video coverage
· Session calendar

SEARCH
· Bill database
· Lobbying information
· Notification service

LEGISLATORS
· Download a printable directory
· Leadership rosters
· New faces in 2013
· Find your legislator
· Senate home pages
· Assembly home pages

ARCHIVE

· December 2009
· January 2010
· February 2010
· March 2010
· April 2010
· December 2010
· January 2011
· February 2011
· April 2011
· May 2011
· June 2011
· July 2011
· August 2011
· September 2011
· October 2011
· November 2011
· January 2012
· February 2012
· March 2012
· July 2012
· November 2012
· December 2012
· January 2013
· February 2013
· March 2013
· April 2013
· May 2013
· June 2013
· September 2013
· October 2013
· November 2013
· December 2013
· January 2014
· February 2014
· March 2014
· April 2014
· June 2014
· November 2014
Copyright ©2012 WisPolitics.com All rights reserved. | WisOpinion.com | WisBusiness.com  |  Website development by wisnet.com LLC  | Website design by Makin’ Hey Communications